這是歷史版本頁面 — 看 MySQL (64-bit) 最新版本
想學資料庫先裝哪套?MySQL 能幫你做到什麼
你正在架一個網站、寫一支會存資料的程式,或學校作業要用到資料庫。你上網查「資料庫 軟體」,跑出一堆名字,每個看起來都很專業,但你其實只想知道:裝哪一套可以趕快把資料存進去、把資料撈出來,不要卡在安裝和設定。你怕選錯,更怕裝了之後才發現不適合,又要重來。
很多人第一個念頭是用 Excel 或 Google 試算表硬撐,但資料一多、要同時讓好幾個人查詢、要寫條件篩選的時候,試算表就開始卡。另一條路是直接租雲端資料庫,但每個月要付錢,對還在學習或開發階段的人來說負擔太大。這類資料庫軟體的切入點是:給你一套在本機就能跑的關聯式資料庫,用 SQL 指令跟它溝通,先解決「有地方存資料」這個根本問題。
01MySQL 到底是做什麼用的?
它是一套關聯式資料庫管理系統,用來儲存、管理、查詢資料。你可以把它想成一個放在電腦裡的資料倉庫,透過 SQL 指令建立資料表、寫入資料、下條件查詢。它本身沒有圖形介面,安裝完之後是背景服務,要另外裝管理工具才能看到資料內容。
02我完全沒碰過資料庫,這套軟體適合入門嗎?
適合,但要有心理準備。它主要透過命令列操作,你至少要會基本的 SQL 語法,例如 CREATE TABLE、SELECT、INSERT 這些指令。官方文件寫得很完整,網路上教學資源也很多,只是學習曲線比圖形介面的工具陡一些。如果你完全不想碰指令,可以搭配 MySQL Workbench 這類圖形工具使用。
03它跟 Excel 有什麼差?什麼時候該換成資料庫?
Excel 適合幾千筆以內、單人編輯、不需要複雜關聯的資料。當資料量變大、多人同時讀寫、或你要做跨表格查詢的時候,Excel 會明顯變慢且容易出錯。MySQL 用 SQL 處理查詢,效能穩定,也支援多人同時連線,適合網站、應用程式這類需要頻繁讀寫資料的場景。
04安裝過程會不會很複雜?
安裝本身不複雜,執行安裝檔、按幾個下一步就裝好了。比較需要花時間的是安裝後的設定,包括資料庫帳號密碼、存取權限、連線埠這些。官方文件有提到,安裝時可以設定資料庫選項、定義存取權限、指定儲存方式。如果你只是想先跑起來,用預設值就可以了。
05它有沒有圖形介面可以用?
軟體本身只有命令列介面,但官方文件列出了幾個第三方圖形工具,包括 phpMyAdmin、MySQL Workbench、Navicat。這些工具可以讓你用滑鼠建立資料表、執行查詢、看效能狀態,不用背指令。其中 MySQL Workbench 是 Oracle 出的免費工具,跟 MySQL 搭配使用的人很多。
06我寫程式的語言跟它合得來嗎?
官方文件說它支援多種程式語言,並提供對應的連接器,例如 Java 用 MySQL Connector/J、Python 用 MySQL Connector/Python。也就是說,你只要照官方文件把對應的驅動程式裝好,就可以從程式裡連到資料庫下 SQL 指令。PHP、C# 這些常見語言也都有社群提供的連線方式。
07這套軟體是免費的嗎?
它分成兩個版本:Community Edition 免費且開放原始碼,Enterprise Edition 要訂閱付費。免費版涵蓋大部分日常功能,但官方文件提到,即時分析、企業級技術支援這類進階功能只有在付費版才有。一般學習、開發、小型專案用免費版就夠了。
08我只會 Windows,這套軟體在我的電腦上跑得起來嗎?
可以。官方支援 Windows 7 到 Windows 11 的 64 位元系統,也支援 macOS 和 Linux。安裝時要注意你的系統是 64 位元,硬碟空間和記憶體要看資料庫大小決定,官方文件說需求會依版本和資料量而不同。
09介面是中文的嗎?
不是。軟體本身的介面是英文,安裝過程和命令列操作都是英文。如果你對英文介面不熟悉,操作上會多一層障礙。不過圖形工具 MySQL Workbench 的介面也是英文,這點要先有心理準備。網路上有大量中文教學,可以邊看邊學。
10我只是想存一些個人資料,這套會不會太重?
如果你的需求是單機、單人、資料量不大,SQLite 這類輕量資料庫可能更適合。SQLite 不需要安裝伺服器、不需要設定帳號密碼,把資料庫存成一個檔案就能用。MySQL 需要背景服務持續執行,對純個人用途來說確實比較重,但如果你之後要學網站開發,遲早會用到它。
11我聽說微軟也有免費的 SQL Server Express,跟它比起來呢?
SQL Server Express 是微軟出的免費資料庫,介面是中文的,圖形工具 SSMS 也比較完整,對 Windows 使用者來說上手門檻較低。MySQL 的優勢是跨平台、開源、社群龐大,而且網路上教學資源非常多。兩套都是免費的,你可以先裝 MySQL 試試,不習慣再換 SQL Server Express。
12這套軟體是不是很久沒更新了?
不是。根據收錄的版本紀錄,它從 2011 年至今持續有新版釋出,最近一年內更新了 3 次,最近兩年內更新了 7 次,屬於持續維護中的軟體。開發商是 Oracle,背後有商業公司在維護,不用擔心專案突然停擺。
下載與官方連結
mysql-5.5.29-winx64.msi · 32.65 MB · 連結指向軟體原廠
版本紀錄
- 2026-08-04 MySQL 8.0.46.0 566 MB
- 2026-01-20 MySQL 8.0.45.0 556 MB
- 2025-10-22 MySQL 8.0.44.0 558 MB
再看 5 筆
- 2025-07-23 MySQL 8.0.43.0 354 MB
- 2025-07-22 MySQL 8.0.42.0 354 MB
- 2025-01-21 MySQL 8.0.41.0 352 MB
- 2024-10-16 MySQL 8.0.40.0 306 MB
- 2024-07-29 MySQL 8.0.39.0 285 MB
這一版改了什麼
What's new in this version:
Functionality Added or Changed:
- The SHOW AUTHORS and SHOW CONTRIBUTORS statements are now deprecated in MySQL 5.5 and have been removed in MySQL 5.6.
Bugs Fixed:
- Performance: InnoDB: The timing values for low-level InnoDB read operations were adjusted for better performance with fast storage devices, such as SSD. This enhancement primarily affects read operations for BLOB columns in compressed tables.
- Important Change: InnoDB: A DML statement using the index merge access method could lock many rows from the table, even when those rows were not part of the final result set. This fix reduces the excessive locking by releasing the locks of unmatched rows. This optimization affects only transactions with isolation level equal to or less strict than READ COMMITTED; it does not apply to transactions using REPEATABLE READ or SERIALIZABLE isolation level.
- InnoDB: An online DDL operation for an InnoDB table incorrectly reported an empty value ('') instead of the correct key value when it reported a duplicate key error for a unique index using an index prefix.
- InnoDB: If a CREATE TABLE statement failed due to a disk full error, some memory allocated during the operation was not freed properly.
- InnoDB: With the innodb_file_per_table setting enabled, a DROP TABLE operation could cause a crash, due to a race condition that depended on the timing of pending I/O requests.
- InnoDB: If the server crashed at the specific point when a change buffer entry was being merged into a buffer pool page, the transaction log and the change buffer were left in an inconsistent state. After a restart, MySQL could crash after reading the corresponding secondary index page. The problem was more likely to occur in MySQL 5.5 or later, where the original insert buffering mechanism was generalized to cover other operations.
- InnoDB: Inserting data of varying record lengths into an InnoDB table that used compression could cause the server to halt with an error.
- InnoDB: If a table was defined with an index key length very close to the upper length limit of 3072, a query against that table could cause a serious error.
- InnoDB: When an auto-increment column used a FLOAT or DOUBLE data type, if the auto-increment value became very large (larger than the maximum unsigned long long value), subsequent inserts could fail or cause the server to halt.
- InnoDB: If a transaction was started with a consistent snapshot, then new indexes were added to the table while the transaction was in progress, a subsequent UPDATE statement could incorrectly encounter the error:
- HA_ERR_TABLE_DEF_CHANGED: insufficient history for index
- This issue could cause an assertion error in debug builds.
- InnoDB: The error message was improved for the case where an UPDATE failed because the row included several BLOB values greater than 768 bytes each, causing the size of a row to exceed half the page size. The old message, was misleading; it suggested using BLOBs, when the 768-byte prefix for each BLOB column was the cause of the limit error:
- Error Code 1118: Row size too large. The maximum row size for the used table type, not counting BLOBs, is 8126. You have to change some columns to TEXT or BLOBs
- A workaround for the problem was to create the table with the ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC or ROW_FORMAT=COMPRESSED clause, which is now suggested in the message.
- InnoDB: In rare circumstances, MySQL could apply InnoDB undo records out of order during a ROLLBACK of an operation that modified a BLOB column. This issue could cause an assertion error in debug builds:
- !bpage->file_page_was_freed
- Replication: Updates writing user variables whose values were never set on a slave while using --replicate-ignore-table could cause the slave to fail.
- Replication: Backtick (`) characters were not always handled correctly in internally generated SQL statements, which could sometimes lead to errors on the slave.
- Replication: Following an insert into a nontransactional table that failed due to insufficient disk space, the server did not properly clean up all pending events, leading to an assert or possibly to other errors.
- Very long database names in queries could cause the server to exit.
- Within a stored procedure, executing a multiple-table DELETE statement that used a very long table alias could cause the server to exit.
- Very long table aliases in queries could cause the server to exit.
- Attempting to create an auto-increment column in an InnoDB table with a NULL type attribute could cause a serious error.
- A DELETE statement for an InnoDB table could write incorrect transaction metadata into a record, causing the server to halt with an error. To work around this issue, reduce the specified length of the primary key to less than 1K bytes.
- Repeated execution of a query containing a subquery that used MAX() could result in increasing memory consumption.
- USE dbname could fail with Unknown database when dbname contained multiple backtick (`) characters.
- The configure.pl script that converts GNU configure options to CMake equivalents generated erroneous output for the --with-client-ldflags and --with-mysqld-ldflags options. It now ignores those options.
- SHOW PROFILE could be used to cause excessive server memory consumption.
- The thread cache implementation worked in LIFO rather than FIFO fashion and could result in a thread being denied service (although this was a remote possibility).
- Within a stored program, memory allocated to hold condition information was not released until program exit, leading to excessive memory use.
- Improper memory cleanup could cause the server to exit.
- Granting or revoking the PROXY privilege caused the server to exit if the server was started with --skip-name-resolve.
- CREATE USER and DROP USER could fail to flush the privileges, requiring FLUSH PRIVILEGES to be used explicitly.
- Access to INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables through a view could leak memory.
- A memory leak could occur for queries containing a subquery that used GROUP BY on an outer column.
- On Microsoft Windows with CMake 2.6, the build process would not stop if the create_initial_db step failed.
- The test in mysqld_safe for the presence of the --plugin_dir option and assignment of a default value to it were performed before the actual argument parsing took place.
- CHECK TABLE and REPAIR TABLE could crash if a MyISAM table had a corrupt key (.MYI) file. Now the server produces an error.
- Improper memory cleanup could cause the server to exit.
- A memory leak occurred due to failure to clean up after QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT/Unique.
- The number of connection errors from a given host as counted by the server was periodically reset, with the result that max_connect_errors was never reached and invalid hosts were never blocked from trying to connect.
- During optimization, ZEROFILL values may be converted to string constants. However, CASE expressions did not handle switching data types after the planning stage, leading to CASE finding a null pointer instead of its argument.
- In debug builds, an InnoDB assertion was overly aggressive about prohibiting an open range.
- On Windows, the Perl version of mysql_install_db created system tables in the mysql database that were not populated properly.
- mysqld_safe ignored the value of the UMASK environment variable, leading to behavior different from mysqld with respect to the access mode of created files. Now mysqld_safe (and mysqld_multi) attempt to approximate the same behavior as mysqld.
- LAST_INSERT_ID(expr) did not work for expr values greater than the largest signed BIGINT value.